<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cherie Blair&#8217;s stepmother to represent Labour in Calder Valley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnbm.com/2009/04/10/cherie-blairs-stepmother-to-represent-labour-in-calder-valley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnbm.com/2009/04/10/cherie-blairs-stepmother-to-represent-labour-in-calder-valley/</link>
	<description>Liberal Musings from the Calder Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnBM</title>
		<link>http://www.johnbm.com/2009/04/10/cherie-blairs-stepmother-to-represent-labour-in-calder-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnBM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbm.com/?p=184#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Oops - My brain flagrantly refuses to &#039;do&#039; numbers before either 11am or three coffees, whichever comes sooner.

Have corrected the posting now.

The postal vote at all levels is a strange beast which has the habit of reducing any political discourse to soundbites and game of tactical advantage. I think they increase turnout but are in danger of reducing political involvement to X-Factor-esque &quot;press the red button now&quot;.

They also have the habit of deciding a vote long before polling day and before all the arguments have been heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops &#8211; My brain flagrantly refuses to &#8216;do&#8217; numbers before either 11am or three coffees, whichever comes sooner.</p>
<p>Have corrected the posting now.</p>
<p>The postal vote at all levels is a strange beast which has the habit of reducing any political discourse to soundbites and game of tactical advantage. I think they increase turnout but are in danger of reducing political involvement to X-Factor-esque &#8220;press the red button now&#8221;.</p>
<p>They also have the habit of deciding a vote long before polling day and before all the arguments have been heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan   press</title>
		<link>http://www.johnbm.com/2009/04/10/cherie-blairs-stepmother-to-represent-labour-in-calder-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>susan   press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbm.com/?p=184#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Wrong, John.  I got  52  votes  - steph  got 95.
At  the hustings, ie the  people who actually  turned up to hear us, I got  35  votes and she  got  22 so  it was the  power of the  postal vote  machine which won  it. I  happen to think Parliamentary candidates  should   be elected   by a majority  of Party members  who have actually  heard  all contenders speak - or at  least  had a chance  to  - in a formal capacity. Perhaps  I am   old-fashioned that way. Janet  won  fair and square    in July   last year  and  our chances of  retaining the seat would  have been much greater  had   we  had  nine  more  months&#039; campaigning   under our  belts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong, John.  I got  52  votes  &#8211; steph  got 95.<br />
At  the hustings, ie the  people who actually  turned up to hear us, I got  35  votes and she  got  22 so  it was the  power of the  postal vote  machine which won  it. I  happen to think Parliamentary candidates  should   be elected   by a majority  of Party members  who have actually  heard  all contenders speak &#8211; or at  least  had a chance  to  &#8211; in a formal capacity. Perhaps  I am   old-fashioned that way. Janet  won  fair and square    in July   last year  and  our chances of  retaining the seat would  have been much greater  had   we  had  nine  more  months&#8217; campaigning   under our  belts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

