<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JohnBM:Liberal &#187; electoral reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnbm.com/tag/electoral-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnbm.com</link>
	<description>Liberal Musings from the Calder Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:23:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why we must have electoral reform? &#8211; an illustration</title>
		<link>http://www.johnbm.com/2010/04/16/why-we-must-have-electoral-reform-an-illustration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnbm.com/2010/04/16/why-we-must-have-electoral-reform-an-illustration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnBM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrupt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbm.com/2010/04/16/why-we-must-have-electoral-reform-an-illustration/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tonight&#8217;s YouGov daily poll puts the share of the vote as:
Con &#8211; 33%
Lab &#8211; 28%
LD &#8211; 30%
If you visit the bbc swingometer this would be translated into the following seats in Parliament:
Con 245
Lab 276
LD 100
Labour would be the largest party in Parliament despite being third in the popular vote.
Even worse, Labour would have 176 more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight&#8217;s YouGov daily poll puts the share of the vote as:<br />
Con &#8211; 33%<br />
Lab &#8211; 28%<br />
LD &#8211; 30%</p>
<p>If you visit the bbc swingometer this would be translated into the following seats in Parliament:<br />
Con 245<br />
Lab 276<br />
LD 100</p>
<p>Labour would be the largest party in Parliament despite being third in the popular vote.</p>
<p>Even worse, Labour would have 176 more seats than the Lib Dems. </p>
<p>Bonkers!!!</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.johnbm.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Fwhy-we-must-have-electoral-reform-an-illustration%2F&amp;linkname=Why%20we%20must%20have%20electoral%20reform%3F%20%26%238211%3B%20an%20illustration"><img src="http://www.johnbm.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnbm.com/2010/04/16/why-we-must-have-electoral-reform-an-illustration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Gove and Proportional Representation</title>
		<link>http://www.johnbm.com/2009/06/10/michael-gove-and-proportional-representation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnbm.com/2009/06/10/michael-gove-and-proportional-representation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnBM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Gove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbm.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watching Cameron on PMQs with my three-year-old son today.
The Tories are accusing Brown of trying to rig the electoral system to suit Labour at the next election.
This reminded me of the 2005 Lib Dem conference in Blackpool when I attended an IPPR (I think) seminar with Michael Gove on proportional representation.
In that seminar he waxed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching Cameron on PMQs with my three-year-old son today.</p>
<p>The Tories are accusing Brown of trying to rig the electoral system to suit Labour at the next election.</p>
<p>This reminded me of the 2005 Lib Dem conference in Blackpool when I attended an IPPR (I think) seminar with Michael Gove on proportional representation.</p>
<p>In that seminar he waxed lyrical of his &#8220;road to Damascus on PR&#8221; that came out of the 1997 defeat at the hands of New Labour.</p>
<p>I would be interested to know what Mr. Gove&#8217;s current views are on PR and if you can u-turn on the road to Damascus.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.johnbm.com%2F2009%2F06%2F10%2Fmichael-gove-and-proportional-representation%2F&amp;linkname=Michael%20Gove%20and%20Proportional%20Representation"><img src="http://www.johnbm.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnbm.com/2009/06/10/michael-gove-and-proportional-representation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
